Free mob hind dirty talk text

Unless anyone has a strong reason why the above issue is incorrect.Pinging Reidgreg, Maile66, Yoninah, Farang Rak Tham, E.3 who were involved in this one.This page holds approved nominations that are waiting to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page.Following DYK approval, nominations are processed and moved into the Queue.The hook above leaves out "about", and just says "in 1913".More to the point, it seems to me, is whether the reference for the "withdrawal" or the "suppression" of the work is reliable?The second part of the hook directly references the first, and states a cause and effect that no individual source has mentioned.I'm tempted to pull this one before it goes live at UTC today, to allow more time for discussion on this and possibly a better hook.

Free mob hind dirty talk text-41Free mob hind dirty talk text-19Free mob hind dirty talk text-65Free mob hind dirty talk text-11

Because this whole thing seems to have been over my choice of wording, not any real issue with the article. So please adjust the wiki article, or remove this hook.There needs to be a new, uninvolved reviewer go over this.Farang Rak Tham was the GA reviewer, and is listed as one of the article's editors. — Maile (talk) , 15 July 2019 (UTC) reopening this, as I raised a query at WT: DYK, but the hook is due to go live in less than an hour so no time to discuss.Such a rejection usually only occurs if it was at least a couple of weeks old and had unresolved issues for which any discussion had gone stale.If you think your nomination was unfairly rejected, you can query this on the DYK discussion page, but as a general rule such nominations will only be restored in exceptional circumstances.

Leave a Reply